You may have to override the measure() method and return a slightly
smaller measuredHeight.

On 10/16/13 7:48 AM, "Miguel Ferreira" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In this moment i have both!
>Because i am trying and trying...
>Maurice said something that can explain that all my changes in the custom
>item renderer dont affect that extra padding there...
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:45:54 -0700
>> Subject: Re: datagrid default row height too big
>> 
>> Do you have a custom itemrenderer?  Or using the default?
>> 
>> On 10/16/13 7:05 AM, "Miguel Ferreira" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >i am using spark datagrid, and in some parts of the project exits
>> >ma:Datagrid and advanced datagrid and the height of lines are diferrent
>> >the mx seems to reduce that gap between top and bottom of a cell.
>> >Some ideas?
>> >
>> >> From: [email protected]
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> Subject: RE: datagrid default row height too big
>> >> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:40:57 +0000
>> >> 
>> >> Hi Miguel
>> >> 
>> >> Are you using spark DataGrid or mx DataGrid ?
>> >> 
>> >> Maurice 
>> >> 
>> >> -----Message d'origine-----
>> >> De : Miguel Ferreira [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2013 15:32
>> >> À : [email protected]
>> >> Objet : datagrid default row height too big
>> >> 
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> I already test a lot of thing even monkey patch the skin of the
>> >>datagrid, to take out the bold of the header and then try to minimize
>> >>the row heights in the grid, but the second is getting a real headache
>> >>to find where is the gap.
>> >> For example: on the skin i even change the property rowHeight but
>>then
>> >>my text is cutted and it seems that i have a GAP between of header and
>> >>the letter of 4 pixeis and the gap is what i want to reduce from the
>>top
>> >>and also in the bottom.
>> >> i am sure that someone already battled this war...
>> >> Open to suggestions meanwhile my fight continues...
>> >> Best regards,Miguel                                       
>> >                                      
>> 
>                                         

Reply via email to