And setting source should be tons faster than looping. On 11/4/13 8:04 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>Yes. EventKind="reset" > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : mark goldin [mailto:markzolo...@gmail.com] >Envoyé : lundi 4 novembre 2013 16:39 >À : users >Objet : Re: Copying ArrayCollections > >By RESET do you mean collectionChange event? > > >On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Amsellem < >maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >> Personally, I am using a third variant: >> >> Target.source = newSource.toArray(); >> >> It has the advantage or not breaking any existing collection >> listeners, and will generate only one RESET event. >> >> Maurice >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : mark goldin [mailto:markzolo...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 4 >> novembre 2013 12:46 À : users Objet : Copying ArrayCollections >> >> Is the following code functionally identical: >> >> target.removeAll(); >> for each (var item:* in source) >> { >> target.addItem(item); >> } >> >> and this: >> target = new ArrayCollection(source.toArray()); >> >> Thanks >>
