@Carlos I wondering myself why this JS output is all about. We shall see.
2013/11/7 Carlos Velasco <carlos.velasco.bla...@gmail.com> > I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting > FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is just > like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and > White TVs... > > Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh > Javascript is the future... " staff out there. > > > 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <a...@malejko.com> > > > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it. > > > > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is > working > > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients > > that do! > > > > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least > testing > > it a bit. > > > > -Adam > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > This was discussed on dev@. Shumway may not help Flex at all. It > seems > > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction > > > side. > > > > > > > > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a...@a00s.com> wrote: > > > > > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash > > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex > > > >developpers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway > > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/ > > > > > > > > > > > >--- > > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > > > >protection is active. > > > >http://www.avast.com > > > > > > > > > > > > >
