Heya,
Do we have flexunit compiled for the latest version of the SDK? Because I have a class that extends ListCollectionView's removeItem() function, which was added in v. 4.10 [1]. So when I try to run the unit test, it says "Suspended: VerifyError: Error #1053: Illegal override of removeItem in [class path])". PS: flexunit.org, the website where Adobe suggest I can get the latest versions [2], is offline. [1] https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/release4.9/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/collections/ListCollectionView.as [2] http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/home/FlexUnit/ On 6 September 2013 18:25, Gary Young <flashflex...@gmail.com> wrote: > Adobe Flex used to have automation built in with Qt test or something, but > it's not really practical, I studied it before, the idea is simple: when > user operate a component, it dispatches a event driving everything, > automation test will record who dispatched what event on when and a bunch > of properties' values, then when automation test runs, it repeat the same > behavior( find the same component, make it dispatches the same event ), > then compare with the recorded properties' values; > > The problem is that code is changing all the time, test can't keep up. > > When I was unemployed, I spent some time working on this: > https://code.google.com/p/flexdirector/ but didn't have enough time to > finish it. > > -Gary > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:35 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de < > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > > Guess this could be what you are looking for ... but it's not quite up to > > date. I guess a lot has been done since I evaluated all of These Tools: > > https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools > > > > Chris > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: mark goldin [markzolo...@gmail.com] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 6. September 2013 17:31 > > An: users > > Betreff: Automated testing for Flex applications > > > > Are there automated tools available for Flex applications > > testing/regression testing? > > > > Thanks > > >