I guess it's this same issue:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21132203/flash-spark-image-width-100-height-auto

So still no workaround in pure MXML? Seems a bit of a letdown, would be
nice to have and may even be common sense. I'd say we all needed it at
least once, but I've always resorted to use code.

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Héctor A <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, 320/160DPI. Anyway, that's not the issue, and it's seemingly
> working as expected.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Héctor A <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It also seemed strange to me. It's because of DPIs, the images were done
>> for 360DPI, targetting 180DPI.
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 07/05/15 10:01, Héctor A wrote:
>>>
>>>> scaleX="0.5" scaleY="0.5" smooth="true" width="50%"
>>>>
>>>
>>> What's the reasoning behind giving a scale factor for both axis as well
>>> as a width and expecting the height to adjust ?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to