Tim Schaub wrote: > See http://www.extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=450523#post450523 for my > suggestion. > > If anything, I think we would add store.queryExact. However, since you > can rather trivially get what you need from queryBy, the need for a new > method is pretty low. You're right. I'll go with that, then.
> The drawback with adding convenience methods like > these is that when Ext does the same, we are stuck maintaining redundant > code (at best with a different name, at worst with the same name but > different behavior or signature). > I see what you mean and I agree. I'll stick to something simple, as you proposed. Thanks a lot for your time, -- Alexandre Dubé Mapgears www.mapgears.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
