Make that ‘text’ not ‘title’ in the ‘gx_overlaylayercontainer’ configs below.
Matt Priour
From: Matt Priour
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Robert Buckley ; users@geoext.org
Subject: Re: [Users] Tree advice
This is actually really easy Robert.
You need to implement the ‘filter’ function of the LayerLoader so that layers
are grouped properly
Here is the simplest but also most manual way to go about it.
Assumptions: each layer has a ‘division’ attribute of the format “X.X” and the
layer store is configured to read that attribute
{
//... Tree Panel config ...
root: {
nodeType: 'async',
children: [{
nodeType: "gx_baselayercontainer",
text: 'BaseLayersDir'
}, {
nodeType: "gx_overlaylayercontainer",
expanded: true,
title: 'Dir 1',
loader: {
filter: function(rec){
var div = rec.get('division');
return div.split('.')[0] == 1;
}
}
}, {
nodeType: "gx_overlaylayercontainer",
expanded: true,
title: 'Dir 2',
loader: {
filter: function(rec){
var div = rec.get('division');
return div.split('.')[0] == 2;
}
}
}, {
nodeType: "gx_overlaylayercontainer",
expanded: true,
title: 'Dir 3',
loader: {
filter: function(rec){
var div = rec.get('division');
return div.split('.')[0] == 3;
}
}
}]
},
....More Tree Panel Config
}
There are other more automated ways to go about it. However, this should get
you started.
One word of caution, if you try to do some more fancy stuff and want to use a
loader with native ExtJS nodeType, then you must provide loader with an actual
loader instance and NOT just the configuration for the loader. Only
‘gx_layercontainer’ and its subclass nodeTypes will automatically instantiate
the loader for you from config. Other nodeTypes will ignore it if it is not
already an instance.
Matt Priour
Kestrel Computer Consulting
From: Robert Buckley
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:59 AM
To: users@geoext.org
Subject: [Users] Tree advice
Hi,
I want to know how to create a geoext layer tree....but the "right" way!
I have seen examples such as here in the Haiiti Map
("http://hypercube.telascience.org/haiti/";) where multiple stores are created
to group the layers together and then add them as nodes to the tree root.
However, although this works, Mr Andreas Hocevar has written this regarding a
similar topic regarding creating a hierarchical tree structure...."What you
want is easy to do. Just get rid of the multiple layer stores. There are in
fact many ways to do what you want. What I have done previously, for example,
is to have layer nodes with a "group" field, and set the filter of the
LayerLoader of each LayerContainer to only accept layer records that match a
specific group name."
I take his word as gospel, and therefore would like to know (possibly with a
few code examples if anyone has any) what is the best way to achieve a nested
tree structure with Directories in Directories which contain layers such as in
the following diagram
Root > BaselayersDir
>BaseLayer 1
>BaseLayer 2
> Dir1
>Dir1:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir1:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir1:2
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
> Dir2
>Dir2:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir2:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir2:2
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
> Dir3
>Dir3:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir3:1
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
>Dir3:2
>Layer 1
>Layer 2
How many way can one achieve this then? and what is a good method and what is a
bad one?
Thanks for any advice,
Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@geoext.org
http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@geoext.org
http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@geoext.org
http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
