Hi,
I'm sorry if some of you think my comments on Windows were misplaced.  I am
actually a Unix geek having worked with HPUX, Sun Solaris and AIX since 1993
and used Windows since version 3.1.

Back in the 90's and up to about mid- '2000, Windows and the h/w it ran on
could not hold a candle to the performance, stability and security of a Unix server. In the company I worked for (Int'l bank), it was a rule that mission-critical
apps could not use Windows  as a platform - only Unix or MF.
And to re-iterate, MAC OSX runs on top of a Unix lower layer.
On 2/27/11 12:27 PM, Luuk wrote:
On 27-02-11 18:05, Glenn wrote:
Hey guys,

I don't mean to sound cocky but, please, get a real OS for your next
desktop computer.

Drop Windows and get an intel iMAC.  MAC OS X is built on Unix and,
/*therefore*/, a highly reliable system
(no such thing as "blue screen").  It also has a Unix shell built into
the system which is pretty handy for me.

LibreOffice also seems to be a bit more stable on OS X than on StinkDows.

The main drawback for iMAC is price.  However, to coin a phrase, "Try
a MAC and you'll never go back!"

Best Regards,

Glenn
If you can only come up with something like 'StinkDows', and a
definition as '/*therefore*/'......

I certainly will not put that in favor of 'Mac OS X', just because it is
more expensive.

than i rather use a slightly more cheap OS, and also did not have a blue
screen since back in the Win95 days....
(sorry, i skipped Win98&  Vista)



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to