On Mar 9, 2011, at 20:43 , NoOp wrote: > On 03/09/2011 10:00 AM, James Wilde wrote: > ... >> >> I just checked the mail header on Stereoactic's email and find the >> following: >> >> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) at >> bilbo.documentfoundation.org X-Spam-Score: -2.59 X-Spam-Status: No, >> score=-5.10, required=5, tests=Unknown, spf=Genuine >> Authentication-Results: bilbo.documentfoundation.org (amavisd-new); >> dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com X-Policyd-Weight: using >> cached result; rate:hard: -8.5 X-Greylist: delayed 356 seconds by >> postgrey-1.32 at bilbo; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:51:24 CET Dkim-Signature: >> v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; >> h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; >> s=smtpout; bh=xoCuOBdAgp6oUaHTej5Iu/LX+a8=; >> b=KFVbZzyZQZBS/OqMbtB+zzfSohdF96BbPNwX5jSqYVFEwHBIyJLIVafUYORvWcS1AKuLBkF6OxADNdeVvx2ZyeM0B4+Rs4VteO4OQTFlL8MBMOF7buLNsC723FpoWPKnt1Mv2apmgp/tYhJhW7ct5+khCB1VsGMU9LM1BWMMFU8= >> >> That accounts for most of the sixe minutes and 14 seconds it took >> for the message to appear. Anybody know why the message was delayed >> 356 seconds by postgrey? >> >> //James > > http://linux.die.net/man/8/postgrey > --delay=N greylist for N seconds (default: 300) > > Hopefully Stereotactic will learn not hijack others threads... > In-Reply-To: <4d77baa1.4000...@krackedpress.com> > Message-ID: <4d77bcb2.2010...@postinbox.com> > References: <4d77baa1.4000...@krackedpress.com> > Which of course is "51 articles on eWeek.com that mention LibreOffice".
Thanks, NoOp. So, did this message get delayed because this is the first time Stereoactic posts or because his message was a reply to a thread with a new subject, and therefore suspect in that it didn't follow the thread subject? //James -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
