On 09/10/2011 04:08 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
I agree, but is not supporting saving in secret formats really isolating them
from the rest of the world? Especially if the other software can read the open
format, wouldn't it be preferable to just tell them 'don't worry about it,
you're compatible' and leave it at that? Besides, I'd think that creating a
plugin that helps Microsoft Offices users read .odf files is a lot easier than
constantly playing catchup with the secret Microsoft formats.
When you have a deliverable in a MSO format, then you must deliver in an
MSO format. This is often not negotiable.
If I spend you a document and then tell you "yeah, now here is a list of
steps to download and install a plug-in that I sure hope works on your
version of MSO and operating system", well, you just the non-technical
people.
I know people that still use Word Perfect, so then we would need an ODF
reader for them as well.
Even well established products have issues when they do not support
legacy formats. As an example, look at Apple when they released their
latest video editing software and did not support previous file formats.
MSO even had issues when there was no support for the DOCX format
between other versions.
The only company that I have seen successfully do this is Photo Shop. I
understand that if you have photo shop deliverables, then you really
need to use exactly the same version as that used by the client. Pretty
much everyone else that does this seems to have problems in the market.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
