On 09/27/2011 06:11 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 09/27/2011 05:45 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 09/27/2011 04:23 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> On 09/27/2011 12:05 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> ,,, >>>> >>>> I am writing an AsciiDoc backend to produce ODF files directly from >>>> AsciiDoc. I was also looking for a flat file importer. Currently >>>> LibreOffice and OpenOffice want to open such a .fodt (or .xml) file as >>>> text rather than an pure ODF file. >>> >>> I suspect it's a Windows version issue. I can easily open .fodt, .fods >>> in linux LO 3.3.4 & 3.4.3. Windows versions act (using the same test >>> files) do as you suggest and only open as text. >>> >>> Perhaps it's related to this bug report: >>> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35580 >>> [fods file from recent documents opened like xml text file and not as >>> libreoffice spreadsheet] >>> You might want to join that bug report and add your test comments. >> .... >> Get's weirder... same .fods test file on Windows with 3.4.3 (after >> uninstalling LO 3.3.4 + user profile) opens LibreOffice Math. .fodt >> still opens as text. > > Now opens as a regular Calc file *after* installing the Sample XSLT > filters (as e-letter pointed out at the begining of this thread). And > the .fodt file opens properly as well. > > I'll uninstall 3.4.3 (including user profile) and reinstall 3.3.4 to see > if it does the same there to check to see if it was a profile issue). > First test will be with standard install (no Sample XSLT filters), and > then with the Sample XSLT filters installed. > > Note: sorry for the almost blog... just trying to see if there is a > difference between 3.3.4 and 3.4.3 - w/wo filters.
OK. LO 3.3.4 (Windows) installed w/o any 'Sample XSLT' filters (same test files as before): - .fods & .fodt only open as text files. Add the 'Sample XSLT' filters (setup.exe|Modify|Optional Components|XSLT Sample Filters| - .fods & .fodt open properly as ODF files So it appears that this wasn't an LO package issue & perhaps was/is a LO profile issue. I'll add my notes/tests to the https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35580 bug report. Apologies for the noise & we now return you to one of the original questions in this thread asked by e-letter: "Is there a logical reason why xslt filters need to be selected manually for installation?" IMO: good question & hopefully e-letter will file a bug report regarding that. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
