On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:17 +0100, John Talbut wrote: > On 14/10/11 12:18, Mark Stanton wrote: > > I think you will find that most of the industry, and nearly all of > > the open source community will be very unlikely to believe what > > Oracle says on this subject. It would be wise to consider that they > > may have a point. > > > All the more reason for us to do as much of the troubleshooting as we > can! My guess is that it is not anything big, maybe a regression since > this seems to have happened before, and if we can pinpoint it, it should > not be too difficult to fix it or get someone at OpenJDK to do so. > > On 14/10/11 12:41, Ferry Toth wrote: > > All this is true, but you might want to consider if you really want > > to use the built-in HSQLDB database for serious stuff. It is all > > java, which will never be really fast. Even with the java issues > > solved. > > > Well, it depends what you call serious. I am sure that people with > really big databases will use separate applications anyway. For my > purposes, with around 2000 records, base was perfectly adequate in terms > of speed until OpenJDK-6b23.
After using Base and earlier Access, I have move to using PostgreSQL and MySQL/MariaDB side by side as the engine. I only use Base as a front end for reports and forms. My largest table is about 3100 entries. > > Whether or not base moves away from HSQLDB in the future, in the mean > time I think we need to get this one fixed and get base running as well > as we can. True, the issue needs to be resolved somehow. > > John > -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
