Piers Anthony [Scifi/Fantasy writer] has been using OOo/LO to write his book for years. He is a Linux user as well. He maintains a list of publishing company for people who want to have their books published. He also has some of his books printed with "print on demand" service companies. Here is the link to his list.
http://www.hipiers.com/publishing.html

To be honest, as far as I have heard and read, each publishing company tend to have their own preferred format for the books you send to them. Books with photos and images may be different from text only ones. For print-on-demand companies, Lulu.com has templates for their book size formats. Each book size they produce has a different page format. Once you have your book formatted for that page size [US Trade Paperback is 6" by 9"], then you save it in PDF format so it is exactly the way it should look. From that PDF book, the companies will produce your book.

As for creating a PDF file, LO's Export to PDF works great, if you do not have specialty fonts, say handwriting or one that looks like it is made out of bones. If you have some of these specialty fonts, I recommend that you use doPDF for Windows and CUPS-PDF for Linux [I use XP, Vista, and Ubuntu]. They will produce the documents with the fonts embedded [make sure that option is used for doPDF] within the PDF document so the reader's system will not try to substitute not-installed fonts with ones installed on their systems. I am told that LO's Export to PDF tends to do this with fonts that are not in its "core" font list.

Here is Lulu's list of book sizes and their templates for the pages and the covers for these sizes.
http://www.lulu.com/publish/books/?cid=us_home_nav_bk

As for backing up your documents, I worked at a place that did the following: Daily backs go to a different room in on the other side of the building. Weekly backups went to a building owned by the company. Monthly backups went to a location off-site in a building/facility that was used by several companies to store their backups in a safe "fire-proof" environment. For you, having CD/DVD storage along with USB Flash drives [thumb-drive, jump-drive, etc.] it a good way to do it. I would save it on your media of choice and place it in a "fire-proof" lock box in a different room than you use for your computer. Also, I would make sure you save copies on CD/DVD of all your work and lock them away in a box stored at a different location, on the off chance of a fire at your place. To be honest, you should burn a CD or DVD of all your books and seal them in an envelope and have your lawyer sign and date it, plus keep it in their files for proof you created it by that date and it is your work. This helps with legal issues if you do not copyright the books right away. I am told that the Library of Congress does some book copyrighting, but you will need to verify that.

I saw the listed info about 40 books. Could you tell us what type of books your are producing? It would be nice to have it recorded that an author is using LO to create "such and such" books. Piers Anthony, the author, was the one that got me looking at OOo in its early days, since he started with Star Office, then went to OOo. He need a package [and OS] that could use his type of keyboard and create macros that would help make his work easier. He went to Linux for the OS that works easily with his non-QWERTY keyboard, and OOo for the macro support. I have not kept up with his author's notes and online newsletter, so I do not know if he has switched over to LO, when OOo stopped putting out updates. As I said, it would be nice to have a list of authors and document/book types created using LO. It is a good marketing tool. These authors and businesses use LO to do their work, you can too . . .

I hope this helps you in some way. I had to do the research about print-on-demand services for a local historical society's history books publications.
.
On 10/27/2011 03:44 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
<snip>
BU?
Back-Ups done by LibreOffice/OpenOffice are placed in a sub-folder inside your 
user-profile
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=12426
NOT in the same folder as the original document.  Eggs and baskets right?  For 
a large work it is a good plan to create a copy on a usb-stick or Cds/Dvd 
and/or another hard-drive on another machine elsewhere.  Some people kept their 
back-ups in the other tower thinking that if some catastrophe affected their 
copy then the other tower would be safe.  Sadly not.  I found that i was 
keeping an external hard-drive in the same bag as the laptops power-supply but 
luckily it didn't have anything crucial on it.  And a usb-stick in front of a 
Crt monitor was pretty dumb too (on at least 2 counts).


Self Publishing at Lulu.com
http://www.lulu.com/
is worth exploring but i think you are talking about a more traditional, 
professional route.  Perhaps something like
Editors/Publishing house - Printing company - distribution network/shops?


I thought editors, publishers, printing companies (and all that) demanded using 
doc format or now probably docX?  ODF will become more acceptable once it gains 
market-share through Libreoffice and other programs.  Like OpenOffice there 
have been strong efforts to make sure it gets under-promoted but the shackles 
are off now with TDF driving LibreOffice.

Since people seem used to getting Rtfs from you i think the best bet is to 
start giving people a copy of your work in both Pdf and Rtf.

Pdf by default is compressed with very lossy jpg compression but LibreOffice 
allows you to change that.  A Pdf is a lot like a photograph of your work so 
people see how you intended it to be laid out.  Rtf, Doc, DocX and Odt all 
display differently on different machine partly due to having different 
printers and settings.

Just yesterday i started being able to switch from giving Pdf&  doc to Pdf&  Odt to 
some people.  Notably (for me) my boss has started using Odt for certain specific documents 
that involve images.  I think for most people i still need to use Pdf&  Doc or Pdf&  
DocX.  By giving 2 files they get 1 that they can edit and 1 that shows the intended layout.

Most Pdfs editors seem clunky and Adobe's seems to need constant security 
updates which does not inspire confidence in using it, nor in viewing documents 
that it's edited.  LibreOffice can allegedly edit Pdfs but it's easier to edit 
the Doc, DocX, Odt, Rtf or whatever and then
File - Export as Pdf
or
File - Print - To File (instead of to a pritner) - Pdf rather than Ps or 
whatever
I've only seen the 1st option but some say they have the 2nd one too.  
Apparently the 2nd one is better. lol



Rtf
I think Rtf was developed as a format that would allow interoperability between 
different programs on different platforms
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=10725
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Text_Format
I think it's the default format for Wordpad.  Unfortunately it had fairly low 
take-up, possibly as a result of being a lot more closed and proprietary than 
allegedly intended
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Text_Format#Criticism

Now, of course, Microsoft has developed a new "Open" standard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docx
although MS Office's implementation seems to be sufficiently quirky that documents created in 
non-Microsoft programs that are then opened in MS Office appear to be quite messed-up, particularly 
pictures.  This has effectively forced people to buy the newer MS Office suites, 2007 and 2010 (or 
on Mac their MSO 2008) in order to be able to use their new "cross-platform" 
"Open" standards.

The new docX format seems to have led to MS stopping development of Rtf.  
According to
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/dd797428.aspx
(from http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=8628 )
it seems that people can still read/write the current version of Rtf in MS 
Office 2010 but it's not clear what will happen in the newer MS Office when it 
comes out in a year or two.

Part of the attraction of Rtf was that it eliminated macros.  When malicious 
code and malware was spread by MS document formats it was often through macros, 
so using Rtf was a good security precaution.  The newer DocX does allow macros 
but, of course, MS assures us that macros are now safe in the new format just 
as they previously assured us that macros were safe in their old formats.  Rtf 
also significantly reduced other clutter and resulted in much smaller 
file-sizes and better protection of privacy.


Odf; Odt, Ods
OpenDocument Formats such as Odt (for text or more accurately, word-processor documents) 
also allow macros but use a sufficiently different programming language's implementation 
that so far there appear to have been no malware, malicious code or exploits "out in 
the wild".

MS Office 2007&  2010 can read/write Odt but only using the older version of 
the format, unlike most programs that support Odf
http://opendocumentfellowship.com/applications
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument_software#Text_documents_.28.odt.29

To make LibreOffice (or i guess OpenOffice too) use the older format to 
increase compatibility with MS Office try
Tools - Option - Load/Save - General
(been here before, see Steve's answer) and about halfway down change the drop-down backward up 2 
places from "1.2 Extended (recommended)" to "1.0/1.1"

Odf seems to support much more sophisticated placement of pictures or perhaps it's just 
LibreOffice/OpenOffice.  After saving a document as Odt you can right-click on a picture and change 
the "Anchor Point" to a greater variety than Office 2007 offers (and i think 2010 too) 
which allows you move pictures around much more easily and freely.  On that right-click menu 
choosing "Picture" (or frame) brings a pop-up box with many tabs allowing many options 
for wrapping text around a picture, creating a border and/or margin around the picture, even easily 
adding a hyperlink to make the picture clickable.


Doc
Is the older MS Office format and seems to now be the one format that is most 
widely used in the greatest variety of programs.  You can set it as the default 
in LibreOffice / OpenOffice
Tools - Option - Load/Save - General
(again) at the bottom keep the drop-down that says "Text document" (slightly 
inaccurately) but change the drop-down beside it backwards up 1 place to "Microsoft Word 
97/2000/Xp".  If you change the other types of documents (Spreadsheets (Ods) and Presentations 
(Odp)) then it's 2 places otherwise you save things as templates which can get messy and confusing.

Of course Doc is probably about the most vulnerable format and wide open to 
malware and a wide range of problems but none of those will be generated from 
LibreOffice.  A 3rd party might infect it but if the documents is going to go 
from
You - Editor/Publishing house - Printers
then it should be fairly safe, or at least fairly obvious who to blame.  If 
professional printing companies and editors/publishing houses still demand that 
only Doc format is used then hopefully the keep their software updated enough 
to avoid the problems.  If they demand DocX they can probably still cope with 
Doc.

Doc probably can't handle the full range of options for pictures and things 
that Odt allows and it's vulnerable but at least most people are able to use it!


Pdf
"Portable Document Format".  Not many people can edit these.  Not many programs 
can.  Another advantage is that pictures and stuff don't get re-arranged and also the 
layout remains the same on every computer no matter what printers are attached or what 
settings are chosen for the machine.  With most word-processor documents if the person 
viewing has their setting set as US Letter and you had yours at A4 then all the text and 
everything all get shifted around very noticeably.  Pdf is like a photograph of your 
document.  With LibreOffice, unlike Word, you can easily choose how much compression to 
set or even make it lossless to avoid any compression.  Even if you choose a high 
compression it still gives people a rough idea of the layout you intended.


I hope something there helps!  Switching to LO is a huge improvement for me 
especially as it has developed so fast, and since the long-awaited official 
release of the ODF 1.2 that so many people had been using for ages already 
anyway.  LO seems much better than Word 2007 and a bit better than Word 2010 
both of which are beginning to make me growl when forced to use them.  The 
ribbon in 2010 is far better than the 2007 and i really miss it in LO but it 
takes up a lot of space without really adding anything except glossy good 
looks.n  Hopefully you will find LO a vast improvement on Wordpad!! lol
Regards from
Tom :)




--- On Wed, 26/10/11, Don Parris<parri...@gmail.com>  wrote:

From: Don Parris<parri...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO auto save
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011, 23:04
<snip />

I can say it is extremely unlikely that your printer relies on a specific
document format - it should print any type of document you send it.

As for document formats, I would think that ODT is a "better" format, but
you can also save as a regular Microsoft Word document (should you need to),
or export to PDF format.  I self-published my book using LO (years ago) and
exported to PDF to publish it on Lulu.com.

I am 99.99% certain that, while it might take a little bit of adjustment,
you will find switching to LO a super nice adjustment to make.  :-)

Regards,
Don
--
D.C. Parris, FMP, LEED AP O+M, ESL Certificate
Minister, Security/FM Coordinator, Free Software Advocate
https://www.xing.com/profile/Don_Parris  |
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dcparris

--------


--- On Wed, 26/10/11, Murray White<phy...@rogers.com>  wrote:

From: Murray White<phy...@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO auto save
To: "users@global.libreoffice.org"<users@global.libreoffice.org>
Date: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011, 22:41
Thanks to both of you. I'll save this
in a folder as I have a good memory -- just short!

I'm working on a very large document currently at 215 pages
and have been using Wordpad and I do a BU of that each day
when I add any new text which I create in a separate file.

I have to now decide whether to continue with the use of
WordPad for my daily work and just add to the LO file after
doing the WP doc as .rtf. I'm currently saving the LO file
as .odt but will likely do another save as .rtf to see how
it looks as I'm not sure what the differences are. I also
don't know if the printer of the book being created will be
able to work from .odt or will prefer .rtf.

Unfortunately, WP does not show how many pages are complete
or give the page breaks and because this document has both
text and photos (many) the LO is nice to use.

For years I have used Works but for this I felt it might be
an issue when the document goes to a printer as we will be
doing close to 40 books.

Any thoughts from experienced LO users would be
appreciated. At some point I really need to look up some LO
tutorials to fully understand all that the program will do
and offers.

I have not checked the "always make BU as I thought that if
that occurs after each save, it could create some delays
when dealing with a big file but once I adjust the current
file and then begin to do the additional add on of
information, I think I'll try the auto BU. I assume it will
save a file called "copy" (previous file name) into the same
folder.

Thanks again.

MW


________________________________
From: Tom Davies<tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 3:48:36 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO auto save

Hi :)
Yes, or use Steve's answer to set it at a reasonably longer
time-interval (jic you do get carried away and forget). Hmmm, longest is 60mins apparently. It is a good idea to
have the back-up thing ticked jic but i think that is
unticked by default while the autosave is ticked. Regards from
Tom :)


--- On Wed, 26/10/11, Steve Edmonds<steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com>
wrote:

From: Steve Edmonds<steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO auto save
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011, 20:39
Hi.
In options>load/save>general.
this is under my Tools menu item.

I turn off (untick) the backup and auto recovery options.

steve

On 27/10/11 08:29, Murray White wrote:
I just downloaded and install LO today and am trying
out some things. One thing I wonder is if there is any way
to turn off the auto save? I prefer to use Ctrl + S at my
own choosing or to return to auto save if I find I prefer
that option.
MW


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to