Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > > Am I wrong if I guess you want to see RC1 or RC2 in the name of the > version ? > I think it is not a good idea because the stable version is bit-for-bit > identical to RC2. So having RC2 in the version name would be confusing > for the stable version. >
I'm aware of that. That is why I suggested to modify the name of the installer instead to include the build number e.g. LibO_3.4.4rc1_Build401_Win_x86_install_multi.exe Also renaming the installation folder using the same logic to LibreOffice 3.4 (Build 402) Installation Files instead of the current LibreOffice 3.4 (4eb10e5c) Installation Files would help a lot, inclusively to know which old installation folders to delete and to keep. E.g. I might want to keep build 400 which worked for me (in case I need to go back) but not 401 which had a bad bug... Can this be put to consideration? It's not such an odd request and it doesn't involve any code changes... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Which-RC-version-tp3497781p3499408.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
