Tom, et al,
I might also add that I have read a few of the manuals, such as Writer,
Calc, Base and Draw and, although it is very good compared to, say, the
OO 2.4 era, it sometimes states to use Help for more information or
details. So, Help is needed to be complete. I have used Help
occasionally and you are right in that sometimes it is incomplete or
downright incorrect, but it is better than trial and error.
Girvin Herr
Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Lol, that is not complete disagreement! I agree it's handy to have both but if you are missing the built-in help then "view it as a feature not a bug". Afaik the Help was last updated for the 3.3.0 and there have been quite a few changes since then.Â
Regards from
Tom :)Â
--- On Fri, 13/7/12, Pedro <pedl...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Pedro <pedl...@gmail.com>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: No help in LO
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 13 July, 2012, 10:53
Tom wrote
Forget the help.Â
...
The help is growing a bit ragged around the edges as it is getting
out-dated quite fast.
I disagree completely. Do get the offline help. It is a quite efficient and
handy quick reference for LibreOffice even if it is(?) outdated.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=win-x86〈=en-GB&version=3.5.5
(notice the second button)
I agree with Tom the Publications are VERY good, but it's not exactly the
same as pressing F1
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/No-help-in-LO-tp3995206p3995232.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted