On the PDF file I generated with AOO, the Properties/Font returned:
LinuxLibertineG (Embedded Subset),
Type: TrueType,
Encoding: Built in
On the PDF file I generated with LibO, the Properties/Font returned:
LinuxLibertineG (Embedded Subset),
Type: TrueType,
Encoding: Built in
In other words, both PDF files are returning the same font, Linux Libertine
G, but the one created with LibO will not find "official" on a word search,
whereas the one created with AOO will. A copy and paste from the LibO/PDF
file will produce the "offichial" spelling, but a copy and paste from the
AOO/PDF file will produce "official."
Both of my files, whether created with LibO or AOO use the same font, Linux
Libertine G. Again, I'm using AOO 3.4.1 and LibO 3.5.7.2 on Win7 and Adobe
Reader.
And, most importantly, I don't even have Libertine O installed on my system,
so AOO can't be picking it up.
Virgil
-----Original Message-----
From: NoOp
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 5:41 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Searchable PDFs from Graphite fonts
On 11/01/2012 09:42 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote:
I got them, thanks.
They are exactly the same as my PDF - the text appears fine but if I
vershion."
copy and paste it then it looks like this: "This his the offichial
Cheers, Jonathan
I just sent you two files; an AOO odt, and an AOO generated PDF.
It is a font issue. I suspect that the non-problem with AOO that VA is
seeing is because AOO does not natively pick up the LO TTF Linux
Libertine G. It didn't even pick it up in ~/.fonts. Instead it will pick
up a Type 1 Linux Libertine O font. I figured this out by looking at the
PDF File|Properties|Font.
I ended up specifically installing the G fonts in AOO 3.5.0; _that_
allowed me to use G TTF instead of O Type 1. Now, when using the G TTF
font I experience the exact same issue as on LO. Moving the cursor from
the 'T' to the 'h' in 'This' causes the cursor to skip directly to 'i'.
Opening the TTF Linux Libertine G font in Fontforge generates these
warnings:
The following table(s) in the font have been ignored by FontForge
Ignoring 'Feat' SIL Graphite layout feature table
Ignoring 'Glat' Graphite glyph attribute table
Ignoring 'Gloc' Graphite glyph location in Glat table
Ignoring 'Silf' SIL Graphite rule table
Ignoring 'Sill' (unspecified) SIL Graphite table
The glyph named Tcommaaccent is mapped to U+021A.
But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0162.
The glyph named tcommaaccent is mapped to U+021B.
But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0163.
I don't know enough about fonts to comment otherwise.
Gary
On 02/11/12 15:36, NoOp wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:23 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote:
Libertine G and Biolinum G fonts have been bundled with LO since LO
3.3:
So I keep on reading. But apparently not in the Debian or Ubuntu
distributions(?)
Perhaps I'm missing the 'graphite' bits? When I follow the instructions
in<http://numbertext.org/linux/fontfeatures.odt> everything matches.
Are you able to post the PDF that you produce? I'd like to take a look
at it with some PDF editing tools?
Sent to you directly. Both the 3.5 and 3.6 versions.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
