On 18/12/2013, Gabriel Risterucci <cleyf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Master document are not only about sharing styles (in fact, I never saw > them in this light), it's about splitting your work in easily manageable > smaller files. I don't even know why having styles would concern having the > possibility to create a master document. > When you're working on a reasonnably large project, it's simply easier to > split it. For example, having each chapter in it's own file, instead of > loading one huge file. It's more stable and easier to navigate. > Ahem, still don't get why you're mixing the presence of styles and master > document. The only link I can think of is that a master document's style > override the sub-documents, but even then... maybe you can clarify what you > meant? >
Found a list of files in a directory, each file was quite small is size. That's what started to think whether a master document is appropriate or not. If styles are extensive in each of the small files, importing them into a new file would be expected to retain styles and therefore make navigation via 'navigator' to be more convenient than opening multiple individual files -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
