Greetings.

I disagree, Tom, in the strongest possible terms.

I've been extremely busy this week, doing what I do - taking care of victims of interpersonal abuse of all sorts.

This Urmas matter is far from resolved, as far as I'm concerned.

Every work group, and that's what this is - we're here to get work done, has at least two legitimate and necessary functions, from the point of view of groups process:

1. The work which brings the group together. Most people, especially males, focus on this. It's only natural.

2. Group process and maintenance concerns. This is usually taken up, if at all, only when some crisis arises (a bad practice), and is much more often a focus for females than for males. One sees this gender differential in families as well.

The big point to be made is that success with #1 depends on success with #2, though this is often not well recognized.

As I am escaping a bit from my own work week, I'll return to this issue here. I definitely am not finished, and I will be attempting to refocus people on the real issue which I raised in my initial post about Urmas. I'll give a synopsis for those who are arriving to this late. I'll also start a new thread, as this present thread was really about an LO instability problem I was having which is now resolved by the current Master.

The issue for me, and I think for all of us, is about this list's being a safe place to resolve LO problems. That statement requires clarification, and I'll provide that.

Tom

On 05/09/2014 02:53 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Nope.  You missed nothing by filtering Urmas, don't worry.
Regards from
Tom :)





On 9 May 2014 05:42, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 05/08/2014 07:28 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
@NoOp

Full threads in context are available on the Nabble service:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Users-f1639498.html
Thanks, I can read full threads. I had filtered Urmas some time back.
However, my question was more directed towards Tom Davies who jumped
into the same subthread following Tom Cloyd's response to me.


________________________________________
From: NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 9:15 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: crash - crash - crash - crash. !@#$#@!

On 05/04/2014 04:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi Tom :)
Good answers to Urmas there.  Considerate, understanding and
light-hearted.  Nicely done! :)
Did I miss something? Who/what is Urmas?






--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



--




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd, MS MA (LMHC, WA State)
Cedar City / St. George, UT, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332
* << t...@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website)
* Sleight of Mind blog: Sleightmind.com (mental health issues)
* Founder: Google+ Trauma and Dissociation Education and Advocacy community
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to