Luuk wrote > They talk about 'Office 2007', not about the versions after that one....
The article was written late 2010. MS Office 2010 is mentioned (four times). Luuk wrote > The last 2 years of revisions (2nd link) are all "No changes to the > meaning...." effectively making the specs old, and making it hard to > make a piece of software capable of reading/writing office 2013 documents. [MS-OE376] is a document referencing the standard (EMCA-376 4th Ed. / ISO/IEC 29500:2012 3rd Ed.). It is mainly notes with some examples designed to accompany the specification. Naturally it is not going to change that much as the specification is what contains the technical detail. Unfortunately, none of this is going to assist with the original (or follow-up) query. Best wishes, Owen. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Table-presented-totally-wrong-tp4121993p4122207.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
