au contraire
This conversation has been fascinating & informative ...
and BTW I too started, as Tim did, with OO - although I'd
thought back-then it had merely changed its name ;-)
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfi...@axion.net>
Date: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice forks
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster <webmas...@krackedpress.com>
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 10:34:39 PM Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster
wrote:
> The key to me is not whether or not it is a fork, child, or any other
> relation to the original OOo project, but the fact that the people
> behind LibreOffice in the early days decided that they did not want to
> see the idea of an FOSS office suite package to die do to the lack of
> "caring" by the one who owns the brand name of the current FOSS
> package.
All very well, but the original context was defining the term "fork" to
someone
who had never heard the term. By now, I'm sure, she's hopelessly confused,
and
a little sorry she asked. ;-)
--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
