Larry Gusaas wrote >> No, Oracle must fix the JRE, or Apple must correct OS X Java system >> calls. >> Until then, LO for tdf#94716 now requires use of the unaffected JDK -- at >> the expense of OS X users now having to install the JDK rather than a >> broken >> JRE to access the Java runtimes. > > Wrong. You need to make LibreOffice work with OS X. It worked before.
I don't need to do anything, but you are welcome to hack at the code ;-) > Demanding Apple makes a change in there operating system in order for > your program to work is pretty arrogant. I do not need or want JDK on my > system. Arrogant? No, just reality of Oracle and Apples relationship and a lack of effort on the part of Apple! Until Oracle and Apple can not sort this out--external projects like LibreOffice have no choice and we've now implemented a reasonable work around (provided by folks responsible for NeoOffice). So, at the moment, sorry but you DO need the Java Runtime environment as provided from a JDK. Otherwise, I would say simply don't use Base and don't select a Java runtime--but not sure if on the OS X builds you get the option. When I get a moment I'll actually check. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-broke-on-LO-5-1-on-Macs-tp4174830p4175361.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
