On 2/27/2016 12:57 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/02/2016 02:05, Tanstaafl wrote: > >>> whereas Thunderbird chokes up and dies under the same conditions. >> >> Please do not spread FUD. This is blatantly false.
> Really? Yes. > Can Thunderbrid really retrieve 2GB per hour from 20+ accounts, > without losing email? You seriously receive 2+GB of *new* email per *hour*? Not sure what kind of real world scenario that falls into - unless you're a spammer and those are bounces from your latest spamathon. But, as long as you have a big enough pipe, I don't see why it wouldn't be able to do it, yes, without losing email. > Can Thunderbird really compact folders without losing data, whilst doing > that email retrieval operation? As long as you aren't attempting to compact the Inbox that is currently being written to (expecting otherwise is ignorant), and I guarantee you Outlook would experience corruption in such a case too > If so, I'm really surprised, because the developers told me that those > were "won't fix" bugs. Really? Care to share the link to said discussion? Because if your complaint was about a corrupted Inbox when attempting to download 100+MB of emails to it while compacting it at the same time, then they were correct to tell you that. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
