Le 11/10/2016 à 19:45, Gary Dale a écrit : Hi Gary,
> In fact, I can't think of a reason for the current behaviour. Why should > switching data sources do that instead of the more sensible behaviour of > picking up the data from fields with the same name in the new data source? > Being cynical, no doubt because that would actually be a useful and intuitive behaviour, at least insofar as the field names and field data types are the same, and LO is still in many aspects not very intuitive for the user, especially with stuff like database mailmerge. What you are looking for could be made the subject of a bug request for enhancement. From my point of view as a QAer, I'd find that a valid request (if it hasn't already been made - I haven't checked). Note that the behaviour with regard to mailmerge documents changed recently-ish from that originally present in previous iterations of LO. Previously, the Writer document which included field references only linked via a reference to the datasource. Nowadays, the Writer document includes the datasource at least where that datasource is a spreadsheet, text or CSV file (or at least, that is my understanding of it). This might be why the change you effected didn't show up until you re-opened the document. There is still some kind of inconsisten weirdness in there in some cases with regard to older Writer documents that were made before the change to integrate the datasource, but I haven't managed to nail it down yet. Perhaps someone else has. Alex -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
