On February 28, 2017 10:51:53 AM V Stuart Foote wrote: >Several, but at its core PS Type 1 fonts have been on borrowed time >since TrueType and OpenType were implemented.
The same argument could be used of TrueType fonts. >Users should have replaced or converted their fonts. Why should they, when support for them remains? >Of note, due to >lack of PS Type 1 support in DirectWrite/Direct2D layout Microsoft >dropped Type 1 font use from Office 2013. What about GIMP, Krita, Inkscape, and other free software, all of which still support Type 1 fonts? These are applications that LibreOffice users are likely to interact with. Yes, Type 1 fonts are no longer state of the art. However, they remain usable, and, if nothing else, are important for legacy documents. Many designers have invested substantially in Type 1 fonts over the years, and this decision leaves them stranded. That said, anyone affected by this decision might be interested in the chart of free font equivalents for proprietary fonts that I drew up about a year ago: http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/Free-equivalents-for-standard-proprietary-fonts Any additions to this table would be welcome. -- Bruce Byfield 604.421.7189 (Pacific time) Writer of "Designing with LibreOffice" http://designingwithlibreoffice.com/ -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
