On 10/10/2017 03:38 AM, Gary Dale wrote: > I agree that storing organizational (not necessarily corporate) colours > in "custom" may not always be the best idea, but given their small > number in any rational organization, creating a separate palette for > them is arguably also not a good idea.
The primary function of an organisation branding palette, is to have a formal description of the _only_ colours used in content produced by, for, or on behalf of the organization. As such, having _one_ palette that consists only of the organisation branding palette makes sense. By way of example, the official colour palette of various organisations: * LibreOffice: 27 colours; * North Carolina State: 13 colours; * University of Leeds: 4 colours; * University of Arizona: 22 in the official palette, 24 in the unofficial palette; * University of South Dakota: 9 colours for printing, 9 colours for the web; * UPS: 4 colours; Back when Mary Kay was alive, woe betide anybody who delivered anything for her company, that wasn't in a colour that wasn't in the official Mary Kay colour palette. (_Even their Uzi's Are Pink_ wasn't much of an exaggeration.) jonathon -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
