Hi, Am 03.05.2011 um 10:11 schrieb Mazouzi:
> Our SGE configuration supposed to be fair share. However we have these values > : > > • enforce_user auto > • auto_user_fshare 0 > and > • weight_tickets_functional 0 > Are these values provide faire share ? No. > if no, what's the behavior of this setting ? It depends on other settings, like a share tree could be set up by additional entries. Otherwise it's just a plain FIFO influenced by the urgency only. -- Reuti > I've read your post about faire shaire here : > http://gridengine.info/2006/01/17/easy-setup-of-equal-user-fairshare-policy > > Thanks. > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Mazouzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Reuti > > now i can answer my users ;) > > Regards, > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Reuti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 02.05.2011 um 20:48 schrieb Mazouzi: > >> We would like ensure that jobs that requests less h_rt will have more >> priority, for example : >> >> job1 = qsub -l h_rt=02:0:0 script.sge >> job2 = qsub -l h_rt=07:0:0 script.sge >> >> theoretically, job1 should have more priority than job2. But i noticed that >> jobs without h_rt have much priority!!! >> >> We are using fair share mechanism. And here is the urgency policy of h_rt >> (SGE was configured by our provider) >> >> h_rt h_rt TIME <= YES NO >> 0:0:0 -1000 >> >> is -1000 is good value for our need ? > > no, it should be positive in your case. You can check the computation of the > urgency by: > > $ qstat -urg > > -- Reuti > > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
