On 24 May 2011 08:59, Mark Dixon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Reuti wrote:
> ...
>>> (I had a similar problem here. In the end, I realised it was because
>>> changed the "requestable" field for the h_rt complex to "FORCED", in
>>> order to make user supply a h_rt value. Because of this, I had to
>>> add "-l h_rt=<something>" to the qrsub command. Perhaps you have
>>> made a configuration change with a similar result?)
>>
>> This would mean that it would be advantageous to have the "p" flag to
>> the "-w" option (i.e. to get a more detailed output than "no suitable
>> queue"). Would you like to file an issue about it?
> ...
>
> Ah, I see - "qrsub -a 201106012000 -d 12:0:0 -w v" gives me lots of
> messages about "Your job does not request 'forced' resource "h_rt" of
> queue instance". Great - I hadn't realised it was there.
>
> Sorry Reuti, what issue do you want me to file? That "-w v" perhaps ought
> to be the default for qrsub?
>
> Mark
> --
My experience is that with -w v it will tell you about problems but
won't actually submit a reservation if there aren't any as such
it isn't a great default.


> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Dixon                       Email    : [email protected]
> HPC/Grid Systems Support         Tel (int): 35429
> Information Systems Services     Tel (ext): +44(0)113 343 5429
> University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to