Hi, Peter,

The script is a bit unique to my configuration (users request ppn,nodes,pcpus for parallel jobs, JSV handles the rest). The script uses these variables to determine memory requirements accordingly (esp. for multi-threaded jobs). We use mem_free as the consumable. The script is attached... hopefully, the list allows it.

-Brian



On 08/30/2012 05:48 AM, Peter van Heusden wrote:
I've had exactly the same experience. Java seems to do some kind of
calculation based on total system memory, and you need to size h_vmem to
much more than the java application's real memory use in order to make
the job run.
Reuti, have you dealt with this problem? Brian, could you share the
memkiller script you use?

Thanks,
Peter

On 08/29/2012 06:09 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
We found h_vmem to be highly unpredictable, especially with java-based
applications.  Stack settings were screwed up, certain applications
wouldn't launch (segfaults), and hard limits were hard to determine
for things like MPI applications.  When your master has to launch 1024
MPI sub-tasks (qrsh), it generally eats up more VMEM than the slave
tasks do.  It was just hard to get right.

-Brian

Brian Smith
Sr. System Administrator
Research Computing, University of South Florida
4202 E. Fowler Ave. SVC4010
Office Phone: +1 813 974-1467
Organization URL: http://rc.usf.edu

On 08/29/2012 11:33 AM, Reuti wrote:
Am 29.08.2012 um 17:21 schrieb Brian Smith:

We use mem_free variable as a consumable.  Then, we use a cronjob
called memkiller that terminates jobs if they go over their
requested (or default) memory allocation and
It would be more straight forward to use directly h_vmem. This is
controlled by SGE and the job exceeding the limit will be killed by
SGE. If you consume it as a consumable on a exechost level, it could
be set to the built in physical memory.

Was there any reason to use mem_free?

-- Reuti


1. Swap space on node is used
2. Swap rate is greater than 100 I/Os per second

The user gets emailed with a report if this happens.

This has made dealing with the oom killer a thing of the past in our
shop.

We manage memory on the principle that swap should NEVER be used.
If you're hitting oom killer, you're pretty far beyond that in terms
of memory utilization; if performance is a consideration, MHO is you
should be looking to schedule your memory usage accordingly.  Oom
killer shouldn't be a factor if memory is handled as a scheduler
consideration.

-Brian

Brian Smith
Sr. System Administrator
Research Computing, University of South Florida
4202 E. Fowler Ave. SVC4010
Office Phone: +1 813 974-1467
Organization URL: http://rc.usf.edu

On 08/29/2012 11:02 AM, Ben De Luca wrote:
I was wondering, how people deal with oom conditions on there cluster.
We constantly have machines that die because the oom killer takes out
critical system services.

Has any experiance with the oom_adj proc value, or a patch to grid to
support it?


   /proc/[pid]/oom_adj (since Linux 2.6.11)
                This file can be used to adjust the score used to
select
which process
                should be killed in an out-of-memory (OOM) situation.
The kernel uses
                this value for a bit-shift operation of the process's
oom_score value:
                valid values are in the range -16 to +15, plus the
special value -17,
                which disables OOM-killing altogether for this process.
A positive
                score increases the likelihood of this process being
killed by the OOM-
                killer; a negative score decreases the likelihood.  The
default value
                for this file is 0; a new process inherits its
parent's oom_adj
                setting.  A process must be privileged
(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) to update
                this file.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Attachment: memkiller.sh
Description: application/shellscript

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to