Hi Reuti,

>> is it possible to restrict access to a queue by anything but ACL or project? A complex/resource would be a favourite.

A forced boolean complex attached to a queue?

Ah, no. Thought of that, but can't in this case; this would overall limit access to the queue on this host group. Current right to it are project/user based, and the behaviour shouldn't change - the whole problem is that I'd like a setup like 'either this complex OR this user OR this project' (and the bit with the complex seems to be exclusively AND :) ).

Possible alternative - is there a way to set things up so that interactive jobs 
aren't suspended via queue subordination (on a specific hostgroup)?

Only with a second queue without subordination - an RFE for a "suspendable" 
flag I had in mind too: https://arc.liv.ac.uk/trac/SGE/ticket/735

Yes, that would be quite nice to have really!

Oh well. I think in this case, project it will have to be. Well, or queue. Shame, I'd have liked to keep the projects users group (not workload) centric (and I like to keep queue numbers down)!

Tina

-- Reuti


Scenario is this - cluster with multiple (subordinate) queues; access to the 
highest priority one is limited (both user and/or project, depending on host 
group). Unfortunately, now also got an interactive job that should not be 
suspended regardless of who's running it. Not quite sure if they need to be in 
highest priority queue (might be the easiest).

I could introduce a project for this I suppose; however, if there was a way to 
solve it with a resource I'd prefer that. Any suggestions?

Tina
--
Tina Friedrich, Computer Systems Administrator, Diamond Light Source Ltd
Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus - 01235 77 8442

--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot 
guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we 
cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of 
software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom



_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Tina Friedrich, Computer Systems Administrator, Diamond Light Source Ltd
Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus - 01235 77 8442

--
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom




_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to