I was taking the lack of a initial computed priority for the held jobs as
an indication they would inherit the target's priority.  If once the hold
is released, when the target completes, they each receive a computed
priority based on the usual scheduler factors this is what I'm looking to
achieve for these jobs.

Regards,

GM

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Jesse Becker <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> I took a look at the latest SoGE code, and I *think* that jobs with
> holds have priorites explicitly forced to zero.  Once the hold is
> removed, they should be assigned calculated priority values according to
> whatever your scheduler configuration dictates.
>
> Or are you talking about the '-p priority' value set by the users?
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:45:06PM -0500, Greg Ball wrote:
>
>> The target for the -hold_jid is a standard job and is assigned a priority.
>> The subsequent (second, third, etc,) jobs submitted with the -hold_jid
>> option receive no (0.00000) priority, I would like these jobs to receive
>> their own non-zero priorities but still be started sequentially.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> GM
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Reuti <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > Am 12.12.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Greg Ball <[email protected]>:
>>> >
>>> > When submitting jobs with dependency holds using the -hold_jid option
>>> the subordinate (held) jobs are assigned a 0 priority, as they inherit
>>> the
>>> priority of the hold target jobid.  Is it possible for the held (hqw)
>>> jobs
>>> to each be assigned their own priority and still function sequentially,
>>> or
>>> are there alternate methods for processing sequential jobs such that they
>>> obtain their own priorities.
>>>
>>> I'm not quite clear what you want to achieve. You have three jobs - one
>>> running and a second waiting for the end of that job. And then a third
>>> job
>>> which is waiting for the completion of the second job. For this third job
>>> you want an increased priority?
>>>
>>> --- Reuti
>>>
>>>
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > GM
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > users mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>  _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> --
> Jesse Becker (Contractor)
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to