Hi Dan:

qsub -cwd -b y 'metal < input.file > log.file'

Might work, if users/you still want to work without script files.

Default queue -- to $SGE_ROOT/default/common/sge_request add:

-q all.q

(or whatever your default queue is) That sets a hard queue, which can be 
overridden with '-q someotherqueue'.

Not sure about the last ... generally nodes will only error out if the error is 
a GE error, not a job error, so maybe they're just job errors? Do simple jobs 
work?

-Hugh

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Dan Hyatt
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [gridengine users] command runs in grid engine but does not 
complete.


As my grid engine was stable and working...and that was more important 
than anything else. I left it mostly running minimally administered for 
a year.

When I went to add 6 more nodes to the grid, I inadvertently and 
stupidly reconfigured the grid breaking it.

So I am trying to get the grid back to where my users expect it.


I found what my problem was and a work around...

the command  was

qsub -cwd -b y metal < input.file > log.file  and it was choking

when I put   metal < input.file > log.file  into a script file, and ran
qsub -cwd script.bash         it works fine


The next two issues that I have been googling and pouring over the 
documentation....

When I send a job to a queue, if the queue is busy it sends it to the 
next queue (defeating the purpose of separate queues in my env). How do 
I set the queues to run jobs ONLY in the appointed queue?

The execute nodes were updated, and some are not playing well in the 
sandbox. When the grid sends a job there, it hangs, sends an error but 
does not remove that blade from the execute node list like it did before.
Is there an easy way to manually test the execute nodes (there are 180), 
and why is it not removing bad nodes from the available nodes as it did 
before?  Before it would mark it unusable so when I list the execute 
nodes I would see that the node was bad and it would not accept jobs.


On 06/08/2015 02:10 PM, Alex Chekholko wrote:
> What was the "grid reconfiguration"?
>
> On 06/08/2015 11:42 AM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
>>
>> We are running a binary program called metaanalysis, which the user says
>> was working prior to a grid reconfiguration.
>>
>>
>> qsub -cwd -b y /dsg_cent/bin/metal < c22srcfile.txt > c22SBP.log
>>
>> This starts, runs, creates the logs, and then fails to create the data
>> files
>> qsub -cwd -b y  /dsg_cent/bin/metal < c22srcfile.txt > c22SBP.log
>>
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics 8523209 Jun  8 09:53 c22GENOA.SBP.EA.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics 8660667 Jun  8 09:53 c22FamHS.SBP.ea.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics 6025412 Jun  8 09:53 
>> c22HYPERGEN.SBP.EA.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics    2061 Jun  8 09:53 c22srcfile.txt
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics      43 Jun  8 13:40 c22SBP.log
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dhyatt genetics       0 Jun  8 13:40 metal.e1043
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dhyatt genetics    2743 Jun  8 13:40 metal.o1043
>> [dhyatt@blade5-2-1 c22
>>
>>   the control/output file indicates everything runs there are .o and .e
>> files, but no data
>>
>>
>> The command line works fine, and creates the data files. But I need to
>> run large jobs on the queue
>>
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics  8523209 Jun  8 09:53 
>> c22GENOA.SBP.EA.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics  8660667 Jun  8 09:53 
>> c22FamHS.SBP.ea.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics  6025412 Jun  8 09:53
>> c22HYPERGEN.SBP.EA.M1.csv
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 aldi   genetics     2061 Jun  8 09:53 c22srcfile.txt
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics  8177082 Jun  8 13:39 METAANALYSIS1.TBL
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics     1054 Jun  8 13:39 
>> METAANALYSIS1.TBL.info
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics 10487038 Jun  8 13:39 METAANALYSIS2.TBL
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics     1316 Jun  8 13:39 
>> METAANALYSIS2.TBL.info
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dhyatt genetics     5030 Jun  8 13:39 c22SBP.log
>>
>> any thoughts?
>>
>> Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to