Thanks for the input Schalk, Can anyone else indicate if this looks like a bug, or an intended behavior? If so, I can submit the bug.
Gerald R. Wiltse jerrywil...@gmail.com On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Schalk Cronjé <ysb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The interesting thing about this for me is that for > > binding.with { > println cow > } > > the generated code is > > public static java.lang.Object action(Foo $self) { > return $self .binding.with({ > return $self.println( $self .cow) > }.rehydrate($self, $self, $self)) > } > > but for > > println binding.cow > > the generated code is > > public static java.lang.Object action(Foo $self) { > return $self.println( $self .binding.cow) > > } > > > On 10/02/2016 16:52, Gerald Wiltse wrote: > > This example returns the error inside the with closure: > > "No such property: cow for class:Bar" > > It seems .with() in a trait does not resolve the way it "normally" does. > > > trait Foo { > def action() { > println binding.cow > binding.with { > println cow > } > } > } > > class Bar implements Foo { > Binding binding = new Binding() > } > > > def myBar = new Bar() > myBar.binding.cow = "says moo" > myBar.action() > > > If anyone has any insight, it would be helpful. > > > Gerald R. Wiltse > jerrywil...@gmail.com > > > > -- > Schalk W. Cronjé > Twitter / Ello / Toeter : @ysb33r > >