If we do it the doc way: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/documentation/#_static_compilation_by_default would I just use http://docs.groovy-lang.org/next/html/gapi/groovy/transform/CompileDynamic.html
for classes I want to be dynamic -- or is it for methods only? Docs: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/next/html/gapi/groovy/transform/CompileStatic.html seem to make it seem like you can only use it on methods? On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Thibault Kruse <tibokr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I would prefer to have a codenarc rule enforcing @CompileStatic for > projects requiring it that way. > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Winnebeck, Jason > <jason.winneb...@windstream.com> wrote: > > Tying Cédric’s advice to your previous question about gmavenplus and > joint > > compilation, per > > https://github.com/groovy/GMavenPlus/wiki/Examples#configuration-script > you > > add the configuration tag with a reference to your groovy script. > > > > > > > > Actually about 90+% of our code base in Groovy is CompileStatic I wonder > if > > we should use that. Cédric, if we use the config script method, is it > still > > possible to use the “skip” annotation to switch back to dynamic mode? > Even > > if it worked, I highly doubt IntelliJ IDEA would know about it and think > all > > files are dynamic typing so probably it’s still best for us to add > > @CompileStatic everywhere, but sometimes we forget where we wanted it. > The > > performance difference is extreme when we forget it, on a certain class > we > > missed recently it took our page rendering times from about 4ms to 52ms, > so > > for us it’s an actual “bug” to forget to add @CompileStatic. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > From: Cédric Champeau [mailto:cedric.champ...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:29 AM > > To: users@groovy.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Is it possible to enable CompileStatic for an entire project > > > > > > > > It's in the docs: > > > http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/documentation/#_static_compilation_by_default > > > > > > > > 2016-06-21 14:24 GMT+02:00 Mr Andersson <mr.andersson....@gmail.com>: > > > > Is it possible to enable CompileStatic for an entire project? > > > > Or do you have to do it on a per class basis? > > > > I like Groovy for some of it's features, and mostly for it's close to > Java > > syntax but I would really like it to be a static language. > > > > I've heard about Groovy++ but I believe that's dead by now, no? > > > > Question is wether you can tell the Groovy compiler with a flag to treat > all > > Groovy classes on certain paths as static? > > > > Preferable doable from ANT too. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the > intended > > recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the > sender > > by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any > > attachments. >
