What about `object.itselfWith(Closure)`? Then its understood as returning the object itself but with the changes that follow.
Blessings, Jordan On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Cédric Champeau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with what Jason said. I'm still up for `tap`. We could use > > `with(true) { ... }`, but I also dislike "with(returnThis: true) {... }" > > because it's not type safe. > > If we progress GROOVY-7956, we'd have type safety but I agree with you > anyway. And it should be returnImplicitThis or returnSelf or something > anyway. > > Cheers, Paul. >
