On 22.11.2016 04:08, Keegan Witt wrote:
Jochen is right, Groovy compilation happens after stubgen and javac,
hence it'll replace those previously generated classes.
Why shouldn't javac compile the stubs? Wouldn't javac need the classes
so that it has something to compile against (since Java is statically
compiled) so that circular compilation works? GMaven worked this way also.
I don´t know about maven in that, but in case of javac you can have
something like an additional source lookup folder, which will let javac
search for additional sources without actually compiling them,but use
their information. groovyc and the groovy ant task are supporting this.
bye Jochen
