+1
On 23 November 2016 at 16:01, Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> wrote: > There's more context in that thread here: > http://www.groovy-lang.org/mailing-lists.html > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Abhinav Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, you need to give more use cases for this one >> On Nov 23, 2016 9:29 PM, "Daniel Sun" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> If the new operator ?= (e.g. a ?= 'foo' is equivalent of a = a ?: >>> 'foo') were to be added to Groovy programming language, do you like it? >>> (Yes: +1; No: -1; Not bad: 0) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel.Sun >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble >>> .com/VOTE-new-operator-tp5736931.html >>> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> > -- David Dawson | CEO | Simplicity Itself Tel +44 7866 011 256 Skype: davidadawson [email protected] http://www.simplicityitself.com
