I'm preparing to update for 2.4.9 and am considering two significant changes to the initial image. First, to create a volume to prevent Grape caches from being put into downstream images (PR #6 <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/6>), and using a user other than root for the container (PR #7 <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/7>). I'm pretty sure I'm going to do #6, should be pretty safe. But I'm still weighing #7. I wanna get that decided this week so that we pick something and stick with it, to avoid breaking anything later. Please weigh in if you have any opinion.
-Keegan On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well done, Keegan! > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Nice! >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble >> .com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html >> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> >
