On 25.08.2017 10:09, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
for me that is a feature likely to go. If you define a dynamic ctor,
it should return an object of at least the type that the ctor is for.
I do not care about subclasses or such, but I don't like Date result =
new Date() to fail.
I did not expect that, but I obviously agree.
Was going to reply to Paul something along the line that to me it seems
a high price to pay just for avoiding the creation of an actual Mock
object... (ignoring potential DSL use - but even here I would suggest,
someone find another solution to whatever problem he is trying to solve,
than to break the ctor contract...)
Markus
