So my understanding is that because this file is found in
META-INF/services, the JDK interprets its contents as being a service class
name provider, which is it not. We have quite a few files in there which
are "Groovy services" but nothing related to "Java services":

META-INF/services/javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory: references the JSR 223
class name. Service in the JDK semantics.
META-INF/services/org.apache.groovy.plugin.GroovyRunner : not quite sure
why it's there, seems rather new to me, and references a real class
(TestNgRunner)
META-INF/services/org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ExtensionModule : Groovy's
extension module file. Doesn't reference services but it's more a
properties file referencing other class names
META-INF/services/org.codehaus.groovy.source.Extensions : possible Groovy
compiler extension file names listed here. Not a service.
META-INF/services/org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation : a list
of class names, which are not JDK services either.

So I have no clue why the JDK needs to read all those files and make sure
the service classes exist. But it would be a breaking change to move those
files somewhere else.


2017-12-03 19:01 GMT+01:00 Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>:

> This file is used by Groovy internally, there's no reason for the JDK to
> interpret its contents since it has only a meaning for Groovy. In short, it
> declares the list of extensions recognized by the Groovy compiler. That it
> prevents loading as a module is rather strange.
>
> 2017-12-03 16:37 GMT+01:00 Ceki Gulcu <c...@qos.ch>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Referring to a discussion on the maven users list [1], it appears that
>> removing the file META-INF/services/org.codehaus.groovy.source.Extensions
>> from groovy-2.4.13.jar allows Java 9 to successfully load groovy-2.4.13.jar
>> as an auto-module.
>>
>> The org.codehaus.groovy.source.Extensions file contains the lone word
>> "groovy" instead of a fully qualified class name.
>>
>> Please advise.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> Ceki Gülcü
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/obdyvuv24kqpxm6v
>>
>
>

Reply via email to