Hi Kishore, I didn't mean to work on PR as I don't know Groovy code base that well. So please, take over :-) If you don't mind, please submit back PR link so that I can learn something :-)
Tnx Damir On 9 Nov 2020, 14:10 +0100, Kishore Kumar <mvkishoreku...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hi Damir, > If you are not submitting PR for this issue, I am interested in doing it. > Let me know if you are handling it already. > > Thanks, > Kishore > > On 2020/10/08 18:46:37, Damir Murat <d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is reported issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9772> > > > > Tnx,> > > Damir> > > On 8 Oct 2020, 14:40 +0200, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>, wrote:> > > > That seems a reasonable suggestion to me. The constructor and some of the > > > methods of the helper class are already marked with @Generated but I see > > > no reason not to mark the class. Please create an issue (and PR if you > > > like). It might actually be a good candidate to mark also as POJO but > > > let's keep that separate for now.> > > >> > > > Cheers, Paul.> > > >> > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:44 PM Damir Murat <da...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > > > > AnnotationCollectorTransform generates an inner helper class > > > > > CollectorHelper with a method value().> > > > > > Since it is not marked with @Generated, the value() method pops up in > > > > > the JaCoCo coverage report.> > > > > >> > > > > > Is it possible to mark the value() method, or whole inner helper > > > > > class, with @Generated?> > > > > >> > > > > > Tnx,> > > > > > Damir> > >
