I'm interested in giving a GroovyFX a fresh look. (I'm especially interested in the possibility of using annotations to generate JavaFX property methods on POJOs)
JavaFX 11 and later is fine (preferred, in fact.) I also think it would be preferable to target this to Groovy 4. -- Sean On 12/10/20 1:04 PM, Andres Almiray wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A question for those of you still using GroovyFX or willing to give it > a try: > > As you may be aware JavaFX8 and JavaFX9 are binary incompatible due to > package updates. It's a bit troublesome for library makers to keep a > project compatible with JavaFX8 and JavaFX9+ (as a matter of fact I'd > Say skip JavaFX9 & 10, use 11 as the base instead as it's LTS). > > The question is: > - Do you need JavaFX 8 compatibility? In other words, can you move to > JavaFX11 as a minimum? > > Cheers, > Andres > > ------------------------------------------- > Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > http://andresalmiray.com <http://andresalmiray.com> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray <http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray> > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > binary, and those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
