Tried "**.sort{ a, b -> a.x == b.x ? a.y <=> b.y : a.x <=> b.x }*" in the actual source code so see its effect And it turns out its not doing the same job as "**.sort{[it.y, it.x]}*" (*not unless, I guess, its run recursively until the list-order stopped changing ... which I'm ofc not going to do*)
- Sort on linkedlists with double values (inside main li... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with double values (insid... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with double values (i... Paul King
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with double value... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with double v... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with dou... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists with... Paul King
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... Søren Berg Glasius
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... Paul King
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... Paul King
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... o...@ocs.cz
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... Paul King
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... MG
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... M.v.Gulik
- Re: Sort on linkedlists ... M.v.Gulik