Hi,

--- Robert Ionescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One more thing....
> > 
> > --- André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I "solved" this problem by substituting "%20" with "+"
> characters. 
> >>> Apparently, mod_rewrite doesn't convert "+" to spaces as it does
> >> with
> >>> "%20".
> >> Your "problem" is home-made. mod_rewrite always works on the
> >> unescaped
> >> URI-path and you're explicitly specifying by using [NE] that no
> >> escaping
> >> on the final string should be done. So you end up with unescaped
> >> characters
> >> in this final string (not only spaces will be a problem).
> > 
> > Just to make sure I got this - are you saying that if I remove [NE]
> > from the RewriteRule, then mod_rewrite will NOT convert %20 in a
> > requested URI to a space?
> 
> NE=no escape. mod_rewrite will not escape the output, meaning the 
> substitution /bar?arg=P1\%3dTest would usually become 
> /bar?arg=P1%253dTest (% is encoded into %25, and the NE-Flag prevents
> this).
> 
> > Try this:
> >   http://simpy.com/user/otis/search/apache%20httpd
> > 
> > That URL is handled by the following RewriteRule:
> > 
> > RewriteRule      ^/user/(.*)/search/(.*)$      
> > /simpy/User.do?username=$1&q=$2 [P,env=URR:1]
> 
> What I also asked you about in the newsgroup
> alt.apache.configuration: 
> Why are you using the proxy-Flag ([P]). There is nothing to proxy
> here, 
> because no protocol + host is given. So why don't you use just
> 
> RewriteRule ^/user/(.*)/search/(.*)$ /simpy/User.do?username=$1&q=$2 
> [L,env=URR:1]
> 
> I tested both rules an apache 1.3.33, the one with the P-Flag returns
> a 
> 400, without a 200.
> 
> > This results in the following request under the hood:
> > GET /simpy/User.do?username=otis&q=apache httpd HTTP/1.1" 400 369
> "-"
> > "-"
> >                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Usually the original request should be logged,
> /user/otis/search/apache 
> httpd, not the one you're rewriting to. I think it's caused by the
> P-Flag.


I tried it with [L], but hit a 404.
I think that is because with [L] Apache/mod_rewrite is not aware of the
fact that the URL that I rewrite _to_ (e.g. /simpy/User.do?.....) is
actually a mod_jk mapping for the Servlet engine:

<IfModule mod_jk.c>
  JKWorkersFile "/usr/local/apache/conf/workers.properties"
  JKLogFile     "/usr/local/apache/logs/mod_jk.log"
  JKLoglevel    error
  JKMount       /simpy/*     ajp13
</IfModule>

So, with [L] Apache/mod_rewrite think that /simpy/User.do?.... s a real
URL, they try to go there and, of course, find nothing, and return a
404.

Here is the info from RewriteLog:
(slightly different rewrite rule:  /people --> /simpy/People.do)

127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958d6b4/initial] (2) init rewrite engine
with requested uri /people
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958d6b4/initial] (3) applying pattern
'^/people(\/?)$' to uri '/people'
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958d6b4/initial] (2) rewrite /people ->
/simpy/People.do
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958d6b4/initial] (2) local path result:
/simpy/People.do
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958d6b4/initial] (1) go-ahead with
/simpy/People.do [OK]

127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958e5d4/initial/redir#1] (2) init rewrite
engine with requested uri /people
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958e5d4/initial/redir#1] (3) applying
pattern '^/people(\/?)$' to uri '/people'
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958e5d4/initial/redir#1] (2) rewrite
/people -> /simpy/People.do
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958e5d4/initial/redir#1] (2) local path
result: /simpy/People.do
127.0.0.1 - - [20/Nov/2005:19:59:19 -0500]
[127.0.0.1/sid#958505c][rid#958e5d4/initial/redir#1] (1) go-ahead with
/simpy/People.do [OK]


I then tried with both [P] and [PT].
Both of these result in a 200 (OK), which is good!
[P] resulted in both request URIs to be logged:
  /people
  AND
  /simpy/People.do

(this is why I used that env URR=1 hack to do conditional logging and
log only one of those hits (the latter))

[PT] resulted in only the "pretty" request URI being logged:
  /people

This makes [PT] more attractive.


BUUUUUUT, [PT] looked even more attractive to me when I looked at the
RewriteLog log - with [P] the request went through a 2-part phase,
where first the request URI /people would be matched to
/simpy/People.do....., and then the /simpy/People.do request would be
processed and passed through, because it wouldn't match any rules.

In short, this is my conclusion:

[L] doesn't work for me (404), because the URL rewritten _to_ is not a
URL for a static file, but rather a webapp/servlet engine mapping

[P] works (200), but logs both URLs (pretty one and the one rewritten
to), and it also involves more request processing

[PT] works (200), logs only 1 request URL (the pretty one), and it
involves less request processing than [P]


Robert and André - thank you for your help and please correct me if I'm
wrong - I'm not new to httpd, but I am new to URL rewriting.

Thanks,
Otis

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ -- Find it. Tag it. Share it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to