On Thursday 05 January 2006 05:01, Jason Williard wrote: > I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x
... three years obsolete ... > and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which > version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough and supported > enough or should I install 2.0 for the time being and upgrade to 2.2 in the > future? 2.2 is the best-supported version by the developers. 2.0 probably still has more third-party modules that work out-of-the-box. But the transition from 2.0 to 2.2 is not difficult, so upgrading a third-party module shouldn't be more than an hours work for a programmer. And after the first one - when you know what to expect - it'll be a five minute job. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
