T'was Friday afternoon here too... Now it's Monday morning :->

I suggest that the original poster tries to execute the shell script with the 
-x switch as argument to confirm that httpd is indeed launched before crashing:

sh -x apachectl start

However, since Apache actually starts when removing the two lines, I think it's 
pretty clear that the error message is issued by the vl_module.

If the problem persists, and it turns out that the module is the cause, the 
original poster should contact the appropriate forum, or the authors, for 
help...

Mit freundliche Grüsse (?)
-ascs 

-----Original Message-----
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Freitag, 24. März 2006 13:09
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV
> 
> If that were the case, I do not think the apachectl execution would 
> even have gotten as far as line 99. Furthermore I hardly think 
> "Illegal instruction" is a shell script error.
> It may however very well be an error issued by the
> VlApache20_32 module.

You're probably right... it's Friday afternoon here :-)

It *is* a bit wierd that that module would spit out the line from the shell 
script that started the process that loaded it though, isn't it? (Assuming I 
read the OP correctly...)

Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to