On 10/19/06, Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my Windows 2k environment, there was no way I could manage to get Apache 2 (any version) to listen to port 443 and serve SSL to multiple name-based hosts or even to multiple ip based hosts.
Then you did something wrong. Because it is legal to have multiple SSL hosts listening on different IP addresses or different ports. But you can't have multiple SSL host on the same IP and port.
Multiple named hosts work beautifully for me for NON-SSL http service. But I could not manage to set up name-based hosts for an SSL server. This doesn't mean it cannot be done -- only that I tried for over a day and could not make it work :) Have a great day! Bill Angus, MA http://www.psychtest.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Joshua Slive To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443 On 10/19/06, Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My solution (ugly as you say), was to set up another instance of apache for > my SSL server on port 443. I suppose if I needed another secure server, I > would use another port and another instance of apache, or I would put the > server on port 443 on a different network node. Why do you need another instance of apache? One install can easily listen and serve multiple ports. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
