On 05.08.2007 16:23 CE(S)T, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 8/5/07, Yves Goergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 04.08.2007 18:25 CE(S)T, Joshua Slive wrote: >>> Once you know that you need to use mod_rewite, there is no point in >>> fooling around with mod_setenvif. It is simpler to do everything in >>> mod_rewrite. Or avoid it entirely. >> My point with SetEnv[If] was to only enter the hostname once and not in >> every single rule. > > I still think you are over-complicated.
In what way? > But your problem could probably be solved with an appropriate > RewriteBase directive. I just re-read the entire available documentation for RewriteBase and don't see how it can be useful to me. If I understood that short description right, I would need a separate RewriteBase for every URL through which this directory can be accessed. This is two separate URLs, one on domain A with a path name and one on domain B with NO path name specified. But as I'm spending more time with it, I think that mod_rewrite just isn't capable of doing what I want. If it could execute arbitrary URL modification code, I could tell it what I mean. But the provided declarative syntax is too weak. So I'm considering altering the directory structure so that my subdomain is no longer accessible as a subdirectory of the 2nd-level domain. When removing a "www." from the URL is enough, my solution seems to work already. -- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
