As far as I know, no. Although, I've never really considered it. ----- Original Message ---- From: Mark Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:25:54 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject
We're a relatively small shop. We have some Cisco content switches, and the intent *is* to load balance across two physical boxes, but the SSL will be handled by the web servers themselves. Can I use the same cert on both machines? On 19/10/2007, Peter Milanese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have the cash, front end it with some SSL Terminating load balancers. ----- Original Message ---- From: " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:16:47 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject Unless you are using the load balancer ( hardware or software ) or a load balancing scheme it shouldn't matter. From: Mark Drummond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:09 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject Hi all, I have Apache sitting in front of some WebSphere app servers. So far, we have always used virtual hosts in Apache to give each application it's own FQDN. So we have app1.foo.com , app2.foo.com etc. This is leading to a (small) proliferation of FQDNs, and now I am wondering if it is better to have a single FQDN and use URIs to separate the applications. In other words, going to www.foo.com/app1, www.foo.com/app2. So now I am trying to figure out the pros and cons, and looking for some input on how others are doing this. The way I see it, separate FQDNs for every application require more administration. Because we are doing SSL everywhere I have to use IP based virtual hosts so I'm creating new interfaces and allocating new IP addresses for every new application. And then every app requires it's own certificate. On the other hand, the increased separation between applications (separate virtual hosts) looks good on paper, and does give me configuration flexibility, separate log files etc. Moving to www.foo.com/app# means I only ever need one certificate. Adding a new app is as easy as creating a new directory under htdocs. I end up with just one log file, but that is OK since awstats can filter for us. Any input is appreciated. Thanks, Mark -- Georgia: Why am I not doing what they're doing? Rube: Because you're doing what you're doing. When it's time for you to do something else you'll do that. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. FXDirectDealer, LLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal confirmation. FXDirectDealer, LLC is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account activity contained in this communication. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Georgia: Why am I not doing what they're doing? Rube: Because you're doing what you're doing. When it's time for you to do something else you'll do that. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
