On 18 juil. 2011, at 23:25, Peter B wrote: > Thank you Patrick, that does make sense, I'll do some more reading up.. > > I'm actually starting to think it might just be easier to host all the sites > on one server, although sooner or later I'm going to need to do this anyhow.
that's for sure. A single Apache server is easier to manage and configure that many. "Keep It Simple" is a good rule. Think about a security update: you would have to deploy it on every virtual box servers, instead of doing it only once. That's to be taken into account too. >> From: patrick.proniew...@univ-lyon2.fr >> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:16:36 +0200 >> To: users@httpd.apache.org; jc_denton_1...@hotmail.com >> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Virtual Hosts on physical servers >> >> Your proxy can be an Apache Server, with mod_proxy, setup to forward client >> requests for www.hello.com to server1, and www.test.com to server2. That's >> not an unusual setup. Patrick PRONIEWSKI -- Administrateur Système - DSI - Université Lumière Lyon 2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
