> My question is on the other side: what will happen when a <VirtualHost> is > defined without NameVirtualHost?
Then you won't be able to access two different configurations using the same local ip:port with two different hostnames, which is what name-based virtualhosting adds. NameVirtualHost is removed in 2.3/2.4 -- we now just treat overlaps as implicit name-based virtual hosts (but lose the ability to report on unintended overlaps of normal IP-based vhosts) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
